Rajnigandha vs Rajni Pan Case: Delhi HC fined Rajni Pan Rs 3 lakh for dishonest adoption of trademark
What: In a recent case of a trademark dispute between Rajnigandha and RajniPaan, the Delhi High Court held that there was a dishonest adoption of the trademark by Rajnipaan. Facts of the Case: (a) the proprietors of Rajnigandha had filed a case seeking
Kite-flying is part of our culture and heritage, can’t pass orders banning it: Delhi High Court.
Written By Pretika Tiwari [Sanser Pal Singh vs. Union of India and Ors.] The Delhi High Court had recently observed that the Court could not impose an order prohibiting kite flying because it is a part of our culture and tradition. However, the
Sex workers are entitled to all rights available to citizens but cannot claim special treatment for violating the law: Delhi High Court.
Written By- Pretika Tiwari [Sarika v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.] The single-judge bench of the Delhi High Court, while refusing to grant interim bail to a sex worker, had observed that even though sex workers are entitled to the same
Delhi High Court seeks the Central Government’s response to the petition calling for disclosure of information on e-surveillance.
Written by Vidisha Mathur In the case of Apar Gupta v Central Information Commission, Ministry of Home Affairs, the Delhi High court has sought a response from the Central Government on the petition seeking statistical details regarding the state-sponsored e-surveillance under the Right
Parliament free to make law against forced religious conversion but courts can’t recommend it based on newspaper reports: Delhi HC
@newsdesk_slc To make recommendations on such matters mere newspaper reports are not sufficient but a strong case should be made against it, said the HC. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Tushar Rao Gedela opined that no parliament or State legislature is stopping to make
No law that disallows restaurants from levying service charges: National Restaurant Association pleads Delhi High Court
Written by Vidisha Mathur In the case, NRAI and Others v UOI and Others, the National Restaurant Association of India has challenged the guidelines laid down by the Central Consumer Protection Authority on July 4, 2022, on the grounds that no law prohibits
[Wearing masks on flights] Not our job to issue directions to DGCA: Delhi High Court .
Written By- Pretika Tiwari On Monday, the division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad stated that the Directorate General of Civil Aviation should review its guidelines, from time to time, regarding wearing face masks on flights and also to adhere to
Give up the child for adoption than abortion: Delhi HC states on a woman’s pleas for termination of her pregnancy at about 24 weeks.
Written by Neena Nagare A woman in her 20s after a split with her partner has requested for medical termination of her almost 24 weeks old pregnancy. A divisional bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad suggested that since
POCSO Act will apply to a minor Muslim girl who has attained the age of puberty: Delhi High Court.
Written By- Pretika Tiwari Imran v. State of Delhi through Commissioner of Delhi Police & Ors. During the hearing of a plea filed for quashing the FIR, filed under Section 376 and 476 of IPC, section 6 of the POSCO Act and section
Delhi high court ruled in PIL against Delhi government that schoolgirls should have uninterrupted supply of sanitary napkins
Written by Rhythm Agal While disposing of the PIL against the Delhi government, Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad directed that the girls studying in school should be provided with an uninterrupted supply of sanitary napkins under the Kishori Yojana
