Judicial Order To collect Voice Sample for Investigation Purposes Doesn’t Violate Right To Privacy.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Kamal Pal and Another v State Of Punjab held that a judicial order to record voice samples for investigation purposes is not violative of Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution and the right
All Male Government Employees To Sign a Declaration Not To Receive Dowry Upon Marriage.
A very bold decision has recently been taken by the Kerala State Government where it has issued a circular directing all the male employees to sign an undertaking form that they will neither receive nor promote dowry after marriage.
Traditionally, Women are unsecured, Deprived of Equal Rights, and Tyrants take undue advantage of them: Allahabad HC
Allahabad High Court, with single bench of Justice Vikas Kunvar Srivastav, while hearing Bail Applications moved by Accused u/s 439 of CrPC, in the case related to Gang Rape of Minor girl during an online Court Conference stated that “the Undue advantage of
“Pregnant Women need Bail not Jail”: HP High court grants Anticipatory Bail.
An anticipatory bail application was filed by the pregnant woman in apprehension of her arrest in a case of NDPS in which her mother in law and her husband were arrested. It was alleged that she had conspired with her husband in in
Breach of Privilege Motion Against Law Minister Over Statement On Judges Appointments.
It is obvious that the action/reply of the Minister is contempt of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and also a breach of privilege as he has deliberately misled the House keeping the House in dark regarding the order of the Supreme Court.” John Brittas
Safe House meant for all including interfaith, intercaste and LGBTIA+ community couples facing trouble from families: Delhi High Court.
The Delhi High Court has recently ruled that all couples – inter- caste, inter faith and those belonging to the LGBTQA+ communities are entitled to be provided safe houses to protect them from the opposition of their families.
AP HC Issues Guidelines for Promt Transmission of Bail Order.
While hearing a petition regarding regular Bail u/s 437 & 439 of CrPc, 1973 for the case related to offence punishable u/s 20(b)(ii)(c) r/w section 8 (c) of NDPS Act, 1985, the single bench of Justice Lalitha Kenneganti, took serious note regarding the
Section 30 of the Advocates Act will entitle the Advocate to have the right to represent the parties under the tribunal: Delhi HC
Justice Prathiba Singh relied on a division bench judgement of the Kerala High Court and opined that since Section 17 has been declared ultra vires Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, it would obviously mean that an advocate would have the right
Delhi HC Asks Paralympic Committee to take instructions on Shooter Naresh Sharma’s plea
The petition filed by Naresh Kumar, through his counsel Advocate Amit Kumar Sharma and Satyam Rajput alleged that the selection Committee of PCI has deliberately and arbitrarily ignored the petitioner’s participation in Tokyo Paralympics in the R7 event, even though h fulfilled all
Nirbhaya Case questioned inefficacy of Juvenile Justice Act
The Nirbhaya Case(Mukesh v. State NCT of Delhi), involved the gang rape and the murder of a paramedical student in New Delhi in December 2012. One of the accused in the case was 17 years old at the time of the commission of
